"By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us."
—Justice Thomas
[It is possible the cowardly justices refused to hear the cases for fear of inciting more Leftwing political violence and for fear they will fuel the threat by radical Democrats like Senator Chuck Schumer to pack the court. -opinion of this blog]
"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."
"One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us," he continued.
____
There are literally thousands of sworn affidavits and a vast number of evidence that proves without a doubt that Joe Biden, who hardly left his basement to campaign and never had even an ounce of the popularity enjoyed by President Trump who left the White House with a strong approval rating, benefited from the simultaneous corrupt work of the biased mainstream media carrying him without scrutiny and election fraud that caused a sudden dump of votes overwhelmingly in his favor (a statistical anomaly) after Trump was ahead on election night.
The chairman of the Federal Election Commission is on record saying there is evidence of election fraud but that does not matter to the Supreme Court. He will never be brought before Congress or speak to the Supreme Court to explain his position on this important issue. None of this matters in a land that has proved especially since last year and beginning with the uncontested Leftwing political violence that the lawless barbarians are in control.
Election fraud has been proved in other states other than the key battle states. It does exist. Rhode Island, for example, has been deep in election fraud with its voter rolls so much that even the ultra-liberal Providence Journal sued Rhode Island’s Secretary of State who still refuses to fix this problem and still refuses to comply with calls for transparency. Read:
From 2019,
R.I. voter rolls include 255,000 the census doesn't see
From 2020,
Massive voter fraud hit Rhode Island election 2020?
This issue also reveals how turncoats are hurting our country. Justice Barrett was thought to be on the side of morals and ethics and was considered a true Constitutional scholar but she is too busy kissing up to the Chief Justice since her confirmation. A few conservative commentators warned not to trust her but many of us thought she would be similar to Justice Antonin Scalia but so far we have been proved wrong.
At the same time, the Supreme Court did not end their unjust rulings with their ruling on election fraud but ruled in favor of politically biased prosecutors to pry into personal taxes of President Trump as a way to look for any excuse they can manufacture to prosecute him (which many legal scholars say is unlikely) . This sets a dangerous precedent because it means anyone with a political bias who has an axe to grind can pry into your personal records and come up with anything they can make up to destroy you. They can attack a public figure they dislike and have him or her prosecuted or at least legally damage their name and reputation through media propaganda and through a corrupt judicial system tainted with liberal and RINO judges.
This kind of evil is common in socialist countries like Venezuela but it is totally incompatible with our nation and way of life as a constitutional republic.
