Science Feedback’s reply to my OpenVAERS link on Facebook is inaccurate but it is not surprising because they typically attack posts by Scientists and Medical experts like Dr. Peter McCullough without an opportunity to respond with an appeal.
Therefore, their “fact-checks” are always biased and lacking in fairness and accuracy. They not only cater to the always faulty bureaucratic stance of Science and Medicine but they are also known to routinely attack Conservatives and Pro-Lifers while they constantly give Liberals and Culture-of Death advocates a free pass.
In their attack on my post, Science Feedback only addresses VAERS but my post is actually a link to the OpenVAERS website.
As of this writing, OpenVAERS is NOT cited in Science Feedback’s response but anyone who has been attacked by them know they are not a fan of OpenVAERS because they have been appointed to help push the current Liberal position on the virus and the vaccines.
What exactly is VAERS? VAERS is a vaccine safety program that collects reporting of adverse consequences with vaccines. It is a voluntary reporting system. It is co-managed by the CDC and the FDA.
OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data and this data is available for download at vaers.hhs.gov. The system attempts to clear away mistakes that may be present with the VAERS system. OpenVAERS is much easier to follow and understand compared to the VAERS website.
Prior to the politicization of the China Virus by the Left, most Liberals like Science Feedback and news periodicals like Newsweek were all for the VAERS system.
A Newsweek article in 1999 encouraged people to “report any symptoms after vaccination to your doctor, or contact the government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (800-822-7967)” (“Necessary Shots?” https://www.newsweek.com/necessary-shots-166158).
But, in contrast, a recent Newsweek article published back in May of this year put a radical spin on reporting by VAERS. Newsweek claimed the VAERS system is an open, unfiltered system that randomly allows anyone to submit a claim without scrutiny.
What Newsweek failed to tell readers, similar to other Liberal outlets, is that “healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS” and “vaccine manufacturers are required to report to VAERS all adverse events that come to their attention.”
Newsweek also failed to mention the fact that VAERS strongly discourages false reporting by stating that “knowingly filing a false VAERS report is a violation of Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) punishable by fine and imprisonment.”
Therefore, VAERS is simply not a system that randomly and blindly accepts claims from just about anyone but it is a government-run system that is legal and anyone who files a false report is subject to a fine and imprisonment. Health care providers AND vaccine manufacturers are required by law to report any and all adverse events related to vaccines to the VAERS system.
These and many other important facts are conveniently left of Science Feedback’s “fact-check”.
What are the latest statistics on injuries and fatalities associated with the China Virus vaccines?
As of October 1st, OpenVAERS reported the following statistics on vaccine related injuries and deaths:
1,600,218
—REPORTS OF VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS IN VAERS
—16,310 COVID Vaccine Reported Deaths / 25,347 Total Reported Deaths
—75,605 Total COVID Vaccine Reported Hospitalizations/153,579 Total Reported Hospitalizations
—778,683 COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports
These stats mean absolutely nothing to Liberals like Science Feedback because these stats contradict the false and contradictory Fauci narrative (he is a pro-abortion, fallen-away Catholic turned Humanist). They refuse to commiserate with victims of the vaccine because they have the same culture of death mentality that causes them to lack empathy for victims of abortion and euthanasia. It is a vicious circle they have contributed to without shame.
These Liberals probably consider vaccine deaths a blessing because of their erroneous and dangerous views on “population control”. (Look at how they coddled former Governor Cuomo and his scandalous nursing home (China Virus) deaths! Cuomo was a hero while the nursing home deaths were covered-up! See, “Cuomo’s COVID cover-up hid nearly 1,900 NYC nursing home deaths,” https://nypost.com/2021/02/15/cuomos-covid-cover-up-hid-nearly-1900-nyc-nursing-home-deaths/)
Liberals like Science Feedback never questioned VAERS or OpenVAERS until it became politically convenient, especially after “President” Biden “won” the election and then took credit for the vaccines (but when President Trump was in power the Liberals condemned the vaccines as “rushed” and “unsafe” while favoring the lockdowns and voting by mail using millions of questionable ballots as a way to manipulate the Presidential election in favor of Basement Joe! See, “PolitiFact declares claims Biden, Harris distrusted COVID vaccine under Trump 'false' despite past rhetoric - Kamala Harris told CNN that getting a vaccine approved by the Trump administration would be 'an issue for all of us'”, https://www.foxnews.com/media/politifact-biden-harris-covid-vaccine AND “Mansour and Pinkerton: The Democrats' 7-Step Strategy to Win the Election Using Vote-by-Mail Chaos,” https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/09/25/mansour-and-pinkerton-the-democrats-7-step-strategy-to-win-the-election-using-vote-by-mail-chaos/).
Science Feedback and other Liberal “fact-checkers” always attack data complied by OpenVAERS but OpenVAERS corrects mistakes often made in the VAERS system. It states that the “CDC/FDA/HHS provide no number surveys (like the UK Yellow Card system) to the general public. Users frequently make mistakes due to lack of understanding the underlying data when using the VAERS interface, and publish that, so VAERS becomes a source of 'misinformation.' OpenVAERS attempts to fill this gap by providing accurate numbers to the general public.”
These facts are always ignored by Liberals and by so-called “fact-checkers” like Science Feedback whenever they attack OpenVAERS on behalf of the vaccine makers and the government.
Science Feedback contradicts the CDC’s positive take on the VAERS system while also failing to cite the fact the CDC desperately covers-up adverse consequences of the vaccines through underreporting (“Proposed Changes Restrict Vaccine Reaction Reporting,” https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2015/CDC-Changes-Restrict-Vaccine-Reaction-Reports.aspx#_edn8 ).
The CDC has confirmed many viewpoints like mine that “fact-checkers” including Science Feedback say are not true. Examples:
• “CDC FINALLY releases data behind mask guidance U-turn: Study claims vaccinated people infected with 'Delta' variant have same viral levels as the unvaccinated - but only four of 346 sick were hospitalized and NONE died,” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9844761/CDC-FINALLY-releases-data-showing-vaccinated-people-viral-levels-Delta-variant.html
If you are still skeptical of VAERS and OpenVAERS because you fell for the slanderous attacks against the latter and former then consider what the military and the government have admitted about the vaccines. According to Liberty Council Action (a law and policy education, training and advocacy organization),
“On June 29, the Defense Health Agency (DHA) published a report in the highly respected Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) entitled ‘Myocarditis Following Immunization with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the U.S. Military.’
“The study reports that previously healthy service members have developed myocarditis, a severe and life-threatening inflammation of the heart, within an average of just four days of receiving their first shot of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or the Moderna jabs.
“Just one day later, Dr. Matthew Oster, who serves on Biden’s CDC COVID-19 Task Force, admitted that the shots are causing myocarditis in ‘young men aged 16-30,’ adding, ‘It does appear that mRNA vaccines may be a new trigger for Myocarditis.’”
(“Military Admits Injuries From Shots,” https://lcaction.org/detail/210930military-admits-injuries-from-shots).
The CDC has admitted that “reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and TTS, a rare and serious adverse event—blood clots with low platelets—which has caused deaths” but it still has not called for the suspension of the J&J vaccine.
Other reports show a causality between the vaccines and adverse consequences experienced among many of the vaccinated (“COVID Vaccine Mandaters Should Be Criminally Culpable For All Vaccine-Related Injuries,” https://townhall.com/columnists/scottmorefield/2021/10/11/covid-vaccine-mandaters-should-be-criminally-culpable-for-all-vaccinerelated-injuries-n2597230)
Science Feedback refuses to report the actual data on the vaccine’s adverse consequences. They make excuses for the government’s unprofessional and unethical approach to this current issue to the past when injurious and deadly vaccines were stopped after only a few injuries and deaths were reported.
The CDC gives a much lower number of vaccine fatalities than what has actually been reported. This is why a lawsuit was filed in the State of Alabama alleging that China Virus vaccine fatalities have been underreported (“Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC Is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths,” http://stateofthenation.co/?p=74828).
Science Feedback is not moved by this lawsuit and by the facts argued in the case. They act like the data should be swept under the rug and forgotten.
But the data submitted to VAERS and compiled by OpenVAERS is not about playing a guessing game but it is all about confirmed injuries or fatalities connected to the vaccine that by law have to be submitted. Ignoring this data will not lead to safer vaccines but vaccines that can be developed, tested and produced without any moral and ethical standards involved!!
There is no doubt the China Virus vaccine fatalities far exceed the fatalities from the vaccine produced for the 1976 swine flu scaredemic which in contrast to the China Virus vaccine was quickly stopped in 9 states after just 3 people died (https://www.nytimes.com/1976/10/13/archives/swine-flu-prograrm-is-halted-in-9-states-as-3-die-after-shots.html). It was halted nationwide after 53 deaths were reported among the 45 million people who were vaccinated (“COVID Shot Killing Large Numbers, Warns Top COVID Doctor Peter McCullough,” https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/covid-shot-killing-large-numbers-warns-top-covid-doc-peter-mccullough/).
It was not until a special report by Mike Wallace on 60 Minutes in 1979 that a CDC coverup and the injuries and deaths from the vaccine was fully revealed (https://youtu.be/g5jx243DHyg).
The 1955 Cutter Incident was also halted after batches of polio vaccine caused paralysis of varying degrees in over 200 children and caused the deaths of 10 children.
In the moral relativistic world of 2021, the CDC, however, is not recommending the halting of the China Virus vaccines in spite of admitting on its own website the fact that injuries and fatalities caused by the China Virus vaccines far outnumber the ones caused by the Cutter Incident and the 1976 fiasco combined!
OpenVAERS gives a more accurate account of what is happening now with the China Virus vaccines compared to data compiled during the Cutter Incident and the ‘76 scaredemic but “fact-check” organizations like Science Feedback are too liberal and too stupid to figure this out because of their in-group bias.
When Science Feedback attacks the data they do not take seriously the deaths and injuries attributed to the vaccines. They do not consider the fact that vaccines reported to VAERS is actually lower than real data. This is frightening because the numbers are much higher than what the general public is hearing in the news. (See, “Leaked report reveals Moderna COVID vaccine caused 300,000 vaccine injuries in three-month time span, hidden from VAERS,” https://bit.ly/3zLamcR
AND, “Nurses Speak Out at Minnesota Town Hall Meeting on COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries and Lack of Reporting to VAERS,” https://bit.ly/3BFTXXB).
Science Feedback is a so-called “fact-checker” that claims to be unbiased and engaged in a mission that is based on “scientifically sound and trustworthy information”, but it is tainted with a history of Leftwing bias and controversy (Examples: https://censortrack.org/social-platform/science-feedback).
Science Feedback is a pro-abortion website with a biased interest in defending individuals and organizations and Left-wing agendas. This creates a conflict of interest whenever they “fact-check” Conservative and Pro-Life posts for Facebook.
The bias is so absurd that these “fact-checkers” and the organizations they belong to will “fact-check” each other and draw favorable conclusions for themselves!
The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) investigated a “fact-check” complaint against Health Feedback, an arm of Science Feedback, but the IFCN is biased! It was created by the liberal Poynter Institute! The Poynter Institute is the same organization that allowed a staffer to compile a hit list for the Poynter Institute of “500” Conservative outlets the staffer deemed “unreliable”. The list was removed after widespread criticism and ridicule.
Poynter is owner of one of Facebook’s notorious “fact-checkers”, Politifact…
“Politifact ‘Factcheck’ Falsely Claims Planned Parenthood is Not an Abortion Business”
https://www.lifenews.com/2020/04/30/politifact-factcheck-falsely-claims-planned-parenthood-is-not-an-abortion-business/?
“Whoops! PolitiFact Backtracks Factcheck Over COVID-19 Lab Leak Hypothesis”
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2021/05/20/politifact-backtracks-factcheck-over-covid19-lab-leak-hypothesis-n2589771
VIDEO: “How two of the biggest names in the fact checking industry — Politifact and Snopes — abuse their role to tilt the scales in Democrats’ favor”
https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/bill-dagostino/2021/05/25/newsbusters-explainer-video-how-fact-checkers-abuse-their-role
“PolitiFact Admits Bogus Facebook Fact Check After Candace Owens Challenges ‘False’ Rating”
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/11/30/politifact-admits-bogus-facebook-fact-check-after-candace-owens-challenges-false-rating/
“9 Reasons Why PolitiFact Is Unqualified to Label ‘Fake News’”
By Jerome Hudson
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2016/12/15/9-reasons-politifact-unqualified-label-fake-news/
Among the major donors to the Poynter Institute are leading anti-Conservative, Pro-Culture of Death activists including Open Society Foundation (which is run by the radical Leftist billionaire, George Soros) and the ultra-Liberal newspaper, The Washington Post.
Their funding sources page is laughable. It claims “Independent journalism demands transparent financial reporting.” That statement is true except Poynter and its organizations and supporters are notoriously not known for “independent journalism” or “journalism” in any form. They are known for biases and for attacking anyone who refuse to comply to their Liberal opinions, attacks and demands.
When you do research on organizations like Science Feedback and you look behind the scenes to see who they are associated with then you a better picture of their biased thinking and how Facebook’s description of them as “independent Fact-Checkers” is grossly inaccurate and a classic example of false advertising.
