Fauci Under Fire For Cruel And Deadly Experiments On Beagle Puppies 🐶🐾

'Cruel' Fauci is condemned for spending $2m on experiments which saw beagles 'de-barked' and trapped in cages so flies could eat them alive. Bi-partisan fury at 'reprehensible misuse of taxpayer funds'

• A group of 24 bi-partisan lawmakers are demanding answers from Dr. Anthony Fauci after a nonprofit claims he permitted experimental drug testing on dogs

• The White Coat Waste Project alleges that Fauci sent $375,800 to a Tunisian research lab where beagle puppies were force-fed a new drug

• The report claims they were also locked in cages with sand flies that ate them alive and underwent a de-barking procedure to keep them quiet

• The nonprofit has also revealed three other experiments involving beagles that were allegedly funded by Fauci

• The lawmakers have called the experiments 'cruel' and a 'reprehensible misuse of taxpayer funds'

• They expect Fauci to answer to the alleged misdeeds by November 19

Dr Anthony Fauci has been condemned for using taxpayers' money to fund animal experiments, including one which saw beagles trapped in cages so flies could eat them, and another where they were 'debarked' before being pumped with drugs and killed.

Read more, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10125599/Fauci-fire-puppy-experiments-utilized-disease-causing-parasites.html

Video:  

Rep. Nancy Mace Leads Bipartisan Letter Demanding Answers from Dr. Fauci

Recommended Reading
1. PHOTOS: FAUCI FUNDED $375K BEAGLE TORTURE OVERSEAS, TOOhttps://blog.whitecoatwaste.org/2021/08/31/photos-fauci-funded-beagle-torture-overseas-too

2. Bipartisan lawmakers demand answers from Fauci about 'cruel' taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs; beagles reportedly had vocal cords removed

https://www.theblaze.com/news/bipartisan-lawmakers-dogs-beagles-experiments-facui

3. Should dogs be guinea pigs in government research? A bipartisan group says no.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2016/11/15/saving-dogs-from-government-research-labs-gets-some-bipartisan-attention/

The article is from 2016. It mentions the then newly elected President Donald J. Trump opposed the NIH saying, “I hear so much about the NIH, and it’s terrible.” Coupled this be a reason why Fauci (whose wife is a director at the NIH, sabotaged the Trump presidency and withheld key information from Trump during an election year?
4. Lab experiments on dogs cruel and unnecessaryhttps://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sd-utbg-dogs-experiments-cruelty-20161215-story.html

From the article: 
As a physician, researcher and dog lover — and someone who once reluctantly experimented on dogs — a new bipartisan push to end the government’s use of dogs for invasive and unnecessary experiments in Southern California and elsewhere is a welcome development for ethical, scientific and economic reasons. 

After three decades, I’m still ashamed to say I was once convinced to participate in this betrayal.

NOTE: It is worth noting that during an October 15th radio interview with Michael Savage the then Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump criticized the NIH. He said, "I hear so much about the NIH, and it's terrible." Savage pointed out to him “corruption in Science” and that the country lacks "real science and real medicine."
Fauci’s wife, Dr. Christine Grady, serves as head of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. He certainly too these remarks personally and seized any moment he could get even with Trump even though he did maintain (except when he has appeared on a liberal network after Trump left office) that Trump never contradicted the science and always followed the lead of the White House coronavirus task force (see this clip from an interview with Mark Levin, https://video.foxnews.com/v/6143880158001#sp=show-clips) 
This was a colossal mistake by the Trump administration because they trusted a mad scientist who deliberately withheld from the Trump administration key information including his involvement in the dangerous Gain-of-Function research through the NIH. This research is directly linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the China Virus pandemic (“Wuhan lab documents show Fauci ‘untruthful’ about gain-of-function research: critics,” https://nypost.com/2021/09/07/wuhan-lab-documents-show-fauci-untruthful-about-research-critics/) Fauci lied under oath when he denied the existence of or his involvement in Gain-of-Function research. It was not until recent Senate hearings that Fauci faced open criticisms concerning this form of dangerous research which led to the deaths of millions of people worldwide (“Fauci’s agency admits it funded gain-of-function work in Wuhan: What else are they keeping from us?”https://nypost.com/2021/10/21/faucis-agency-admits-it-funded-gain-of-function-work-in-wuhan-what-else-are-they-keeping-from-us/
Was Trump’s remarks in 2015 against the NIH a motivating factor for Fauci to sabotage the Trump administration during a reelection year? Is this why he failed to share key information with Trump and refused to link the virus to the aforementioned Wuhan lab? 
Mark Levin was right a year ago when he made this suggestion re: Fauci sabotaging Trump . . . 

“Mark Levin derides Dr. Fauci as 'political hack' trying to 'sabotage' Trump's reelection bid” https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mark-levin-slams-dr-fauci-as-political-hack-trying-to-sabotage-trumps-reelection-bid