Biden appears on The View and says Harris shares responsibility for their failures while Harris says prices are ”just too high” during a campaign event in Pennsylvania

Harris admits costs in US are ‘just too high’ — as Trump taunts her inaction: ‘They’ve done nothing’

https://nypost.com/2024/09/25/us-news/harris-admits-costs-in-us-are-just-too-high-as-trump-taunts-her-inaction-why-hasnt-she-done-it-already/

Is Joe Biden bitter about being forced by his own party to quit his bid for re-election? He recently wore a Trump hat at the urging of a Trump supporter and he wore it with a gleeful smile and now he just appeared on The View and admitted that he delegated his responsibility as President re: foreign and domestic policies to Kamala Harris. 

Last Sumner, Biden’s polling numbers were so bad and criticisms of his handling of the economy and foreign policy were coming from voters from all political persuasions that there was no doubt he was going to lose to Trump in a landslide. The sure signs of dementia did not favor him as well. 

But if Harris shares the responsibility of the Biden administration’s failures as Biden himself admitted then the same voters who were not going to vote for Biden should not vote for Harris because Biden put her in charge of implementing the failures that have hurt America in many ways. 

The media and so-called “fact-checkers” went crazy for Harris by defending her when it was pointed out that Harris was the border czar appointed by Biden. Her defenders said this was “false information” but Biden himself admitted on The View that he delegated all responsibility, all powers to Harris! 

This is the type of development that will motivate independent voters and even some Democrats to vote for Trump. Trump was already receiving endorsements from Democrats including a Democrat mayor. They see weakness and irresponsibility in Biden and Harris and the fact that Harris cannot intelligently answer questions on issues like the economy or about the horrendous border situation. 

And then there is the threat of Russia and China because the latter and former have increased their military activity near Alaska. They see the Biden administration as weak and without any reaction except indifference with regard to foreign threats. This explains why the Biden administration has no problem with other foreign threats including unvetted and dangerous immigrants who have flooded our nation. 

A Kamala Harris win in November would be a colossal loss for America. It would tell the nation and the world that failure, weakness and lawfare are now the norm and that voters were influenced by anti-Trump news organizations and interviewers who coddled and carried Harris all the way to the finish line. 

Biden Administration Official Says Trump Should be “Extinguished”. Will the FBI and Secret Service At Least Question Her?

 Biden’s commerce chief says ‘let’s extinguish’ Trump ‘for good’ — after two attempted assassinations of ex-prez

https://nypost.com/2024/09/25/us-news/bidens-commerce-chief-says-lets-extinguish-trump-for-good/

Gina Raimondo, the former governor of Rhode Island and the current Commerce Secretary for the Biden administration, made a dangerous and inflammatory statement calling for Trump to be “extinguished”. She said, 

“How did we get here? Let’s extinguish him for good,” the former Rhode Island governor said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe”. 

She may have intended to discourage people from voting for Trump but her comment has a double-meaning knowing that Trump has faced two confirmed assassination attempts along with published reports of scheming groups who want him killed. 

Why use words she knows is the type of threatening language that has been commonly pointed out as language that inspires anti-Trump critics to voice approval of violence against Trump and his supporters? 

The people who attempted to assassinate Trump and others who are scheming to commit an act of violence against him and his supporters hear a Biden administration official make a statement like Raimondo did and think it is a personal message for them to physically attack Trump or to post a similar statement just to spread “hope” for the murder of Trump. I have seen many posts on Facebook that support violence against Trump but these posts are never censored. Facebook is too busy censoring posts only by Conservatives. That is typical of Facebook’s far left bias! 

Does Raimondo not understand that untrue and violent remarks against Trump including calls by the Left during the past several years for acts of violence against him, especially assassination, have been discouraged and condemned even by some of her fellow Democrats? Her choice of words was simultaneously irresponsible and criminal. 

Raimondo was my former governor. She was a failure and an advocate for anything that opposed the Natural Moral Law, ethics, and Catholic moral teaching while claiming to be Catholic. 

She infamously failed to reform DCYF and then there was the scandal of Point Judith Capital, a company she founded, which she abused for her own benefit but at the expense of Rhode Island’s state workers.

On abortion, she signed in 2019 a radical abortion expansion bill that supports abortion at any stage and for any reason. It also undermines Rhode Island’s ability to regulate abortion facilities. A letter from Rhode Island’s Department of Health in 2018 revealed that the state’s abortion facilities have not been inspected thus proving the fact that abortion is the most unregulated business in America. This is what Raimondo supports. She (along with the equally corrupt Rhode Island legislature) does not have any moral integrity or any love and concern for the most vulnerable. She ended her term as governor with Rhode Island ranked and still ranked as one of the worst states for tax burden, personal income, business and education.

Therefore, it does not surprise me that she would use the word “exterminate” with regard to Trump. She is another extreme liberal lacking a moral compass. If she lacks empathy for her fellow citizens and for the unborn babies who are mutilated in abortion then she would surely lack empathy for Trump should he get assassinated or, in her words, “extinguished”.

She should immediately resign and make public reparation because not doing so will give the impression that it is normal for a person of influence to use harsh language that may incite political violence or at least encourage passion for political violence.

Kamala is Proving She is a Coward

Kamala Harris not only refuses to attend the Al Smith Dinner because she fears being roasted and publicly humiliated by Trump (the charity event takes place every major election year. The two Presidential candidates give speeches and roast each other which is customary of the Al Smith Dinner), but she only wants to debate Trump on her own terms and on friendly territory while rejecting Trump’s proposal to debate him on Fox News with Conservatives like Sean Hannity serving as moderators to balance the recent biased and corrupt debate on ABC which was led by two moderators who never fact-checked Harris even when she mentioned horrible lies about Trump including one common lie that even the liberal SNOPES debunked a long time ago.

She now has proposed a second debate except this time she wants one on CNN. She thought she was being shrewd when she said Trump should not have any objection to a debate on CNN because he praised how CNN handled his debate with Joe Biden in June. But CNN’s political coverage has proved it is doing all it can to carry and coddle Harris without scrutiny which means there is no guarantee CNN will be fair and honest in a debate and not work like they are volunteers for the Harris-Walz campaign. 

CNN always nitpicks at Trump and twists everything he says and does and engages in character assassination while they are soft on Harris because they are trying to get her elected. Trump would be dumb to walk into that hornet’s nest if he changed his mind concerning the aforementioned debate proposal on CNN.

‘Groceries Still Too High’: Kamala Harris Undermines Her Own Economic Record

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2024/09/17/groceries-still-too-high-kamala-harris-undermines-her-own-economic-record/

Why would anyone vote for Kamala Harris knowing that a vote for her is a careless and self-defeating endorsement of the poor economic record of the Biden-Harris era? Does anyone learn from history anymore? 

Her proposed economic plan was severely criticized even by people from the Clinton and Obama administrations and by leading liberal commentators and by far-Left news organizations as radically un-American and not in favor of either business owners or consumers.

She is clueless with regard to the supply-and-demand chain and why business owners are forced to drive up prices.  

Related: 

Harris and Biden’s legacy? Inflation, debt, and a leaderless nation

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/harris-and-bidens-legacy-inflation-debt-and-a-leaderless-nation

When Peter Doocy Questions Karine Jean-Pierre

 I like Peter Doocy’s questions and comments that he presents to the White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre. They are based on hard facts and they are meant to incite an angry and defensive response but my one problem with Doocy is that he fails to defend himself or fact-check Karine or counter her lies using the White House’s own record against them. 

She recently lied countless times about Trump when Doocy mentioned the second assassination attempt against him and the fact that the White House’s rhetoric and the rhetoric by many liberals have inspired many people to call for Trump’s assassination or some type of violence against him or his supporters (Trump supporters have already been injured or murdered in the past). 

Karine brought up many lies and myths about J6, for example, that were easy to refute but Doocy just let her ramble on instead of correcting her. She even lied about Doocy and attacked him and he still did not fight back against her rhetoric. 

He simply needs to change his style and comeback with answers that can easily stump her and throw her off-guard. If I can do it (if I had the opportunity) then he should be able to do it better than I can because he has more of an advantage and all the information that he can research and use against Karine. 

Social Media Has Not Addressed The Anti-Trump Rhetoric That Encourages Attempted Assassination Attempts Against Him!

 I often scroll through social media comments on popular Facebook pages that are pro-Trump and it is horrible to see the massive amount of false information against him in the form of comments or memes but what is even more horrible are the comments or memes that call for his assassination or hope that he will die soon. These posts have been reported but are never censored or deleted by Facebook. A lot of these commenters are “bots” that Facebook purposely has put in place to manipulate conversations or to counter political posts that are pro-Trump. 

Ask Meta AI and it will admit that Facebook has bots posting comments in response to groups and pages. Facebook has automated systems and fake accounts known as “sock puppets” to manipulate conversations, promote specific agendas, and spread misinformation. This is frequently a problem throughout leading groups and pages that are pro-Trump. These accounts are never censored or removed even though they are clearly fake and spread false information or favor Trump’s assassination or a quick death of him of any kind. 

It is this type of toxic environment along with the rhetoric and lawfare by leaders in the Democrat Party that encourages the targeting of Trump for assassination. Look at all of the quotes and memes by celebrities, professors, politicians, et al., during the past seven or eight years that promoted or depicted the assassination of Trump! 

And the mainstream media like CNN or ABC has much blame pointed at them as well because they often fuel this rhetoric. It is irresponsible and criminal and blood will be on their hands if another assassination attempt on Trump turns out to be deadly. 

Kamala Cheated! Wireless Audio Earrings Company Responds to Rumors Kamala Harris Wore Earpiece During Presidential Debate

Just The News reported:

Following the presidential debate on Tuesday, social media users theorized that Vice President Kamala Harris wore audio earrings on stage. The Germany-based company that sells the earrings said on Wednesday that the resemblance between Harris’ earrings and their audio earrings “is striking.”

“We do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it,” Malte Iversen, managing director at Icebach Sound, told Just the News on Wednesday. 

“To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign. The choice of colour is a bit challenging though as orange does not go well with a lot of colours.

“Currently, we are unfortunately out of stock and also busy preparing a lawsuit against a big Chinese tech company breaching our patents,” Iversen continued. “We are talking to investors in order to ramp up operations accordingly and are confident that we will ship again very soon.”

https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/company-responds-theory-harris-wore-audio-earrings-pres-debate-resemblance-striking

Of course, the fake and biased “fact-checkers” on Facebook are countering posts that accuse Kamala of wearing audio earrings. They are contradicted by the company that produces them. These “fact-checkers” are simply a branch of the Democrat Party. They are guilty of censoring free speech and censoring anything that makes Democrats look bad and they are guilty of election interference. They never censor anything posted by liberals. They are falsely called “independent fact-checkers” but that is false advertising that Mark Zuckerberg ought to correct because it is not true. 

Trump won the debate but he should have not agreed to it and Harris lying and being coddled and bailed out by “moderators” does not equal a “win” for her!

Kamala Harris is close friends with a top executive, Dana Walden,  who helps operate a company that oversees ABC News! 😡 This may explain precisely why the “moderators” during the debate last night were exceedingly hard on Trump but soft on Harris and constantly lied for her and gave her relief as needed.

Trump did as well as he could during the debate considering he was debating three people. I could understand why he would lose his composure. Anyone in his position last night would have acted the exact same way or worse. I would have walked off the stage after the moderators failed to fact-checked Harris and allowed her to finish her statements and allowed only her and not Trump to have follow-up responses. 

If people say she “won” then that would be like saying a sports team that was aided by corrupt referees “won” but cheating and favoring one side over the other is not “winning” but lying. 

The fake and biased “moderators” at ABC ought to be ashamed because they deliberately steered the debate in favor of Harris but she lost her credibility on her own with her arrogant facial expressions and body language including the sarcastic gesture of placing her hand under her chin while staring at Trump with a sardonic and bizarre look on her face. That look was creepy and unpresidential.

I thought  before the debate that Trump was wrong to agree with a debate on a network that is exceedingly anti-Trump. He should have learned his lesson from what happened in 2016 and especially in 2020. Another reason he should have avoided ABC is the fact he is suing ABC and George Stephanopoulos. A judge ruled this year that the case will go forward. This meant that the debate was never going to be fair and balanced like his CNN debate with Joe Biden in June. 

If Harris refuses to debate Trump on a news network like Fox News then he should counter her by refusing to debate her on enemy territory where she will always be coddled and bailed-out by “moderators” and know the line of questions beforehand. Last night’s questions for her, by the way, closely followed her standard stump speech. 

The entire debate was terrible but at least Trump finished very well with his closing remarks. Trump did as well as he could during the debate considering he was debating three people. I could understand why he would lose his composure. Anyone in his position last night would have acted the exact same way or worse. I would have walked off the stage after the moderators failed to fact-checked Harris and allowed her to finish her statements and allowed only her and not Trump to have follow-up responses. 

If people say she “won” then that would be like saying a sports team that was aided by corrupt referees “won” but cheating and favoring one side over the other is not “winning” but lying. 

The fake and biased “moderators” at ABC ought to be ashamed because they deliberately steered the debate in favor of Harris but she lost her credibility on her own with her arrogant facial expressions and body language including the sarcastic gesture of placing her hand under her chin while staring at Trump with a sardonic and bizarre look on her face. That look was creepy and unpresidential.

I thought  before the debate that Trump was wrong to agree with a debate on a network that is exceedingly anti-Trump. He should have learned his lesson from what happened in 2016 and especially in 2020. Another reason he should have avoided ABC is the fact he is suing ABC and George Stephanopoulos. A judge ruled this year that the case will go forward. This meant that the debate was never going to be fair and balanced like his CNN debate with Joe Biden in June. 

If Harris refuses to debate Trump on a news network like Fox News then he should counter her by refusing to debate her on enemy territory where she will always be coddled and bailed-out by “moderators” and know the line of questions beforehand. Last night’s questions for her, by the way, closely followed her standard stump speech. 

The entire debate was terrible but at least Trump finished very well with his closing remarks.

The “Debate” was a three against one biased attack in favor of Harris

 I never thought President Trump should have agreed to debate Kamala on an ultra-liberal news network that hates him with a passion and constantly nitpicks at everything about him. Harris has family linked to ABC and so there is a widespread conflict of interest there and plus Trump has a lawsuit against ABC which is why having a debate on ABC was not a good idea but I give him credit because he is fighting on enemy territory.

At least the CNN debate in June between Trump and Biden was fair even though CNN is just as liberal and biased as ABC but the moderators did not coddle and carry Biden but asked questions that benefited both Trump and Biden and they did not attack Trump or Biden or make the debate about themselves. 

Why did ABC purposely make tonight’s debate one-sided? And please do not say she “won”. A team does not actually “win” when the referees rig the game in favor of the opponent they want to “win”. Trump faced three opponents tonight and not just one opponent. 

The “moderators” clearly worked to assist and carry Kamala Harris. She was allowed to complete her answers whereas Trump often was cut off or interrupted as a way to slow or stop his momentum. 

The “moderators” were soft on her and allowed her to lie while they pressed Trump and even attempted to “fact-check” him.

Kamala was undoubtedly coached with the questions before the debate. And the line of questions addressed to her by the “moderators” followed her stump speech and this gave her an unfair advantage. 

To be fair and balanced, she should agree to a debate with Conservatives serving as moderators like Sean Hannity and Mark Levin but she does not have the courage to face Trump with Conservative moderators which is why she rejected a debate on Fox News. 

Kamala knows that on a liberal, anti-Trump network she will be prepped by the network itself and then treated very well by the “moderators”. 

The same biased treatment happened against Trump in 2016 and 2020. I know he likes to go in the lion’s den and fight the fight of a gladiator but it is unfair when Kamala refuses to even the playing field by refusing to face Trump, not even once, with Conservative serving as moderators. 

Kamala is being coddled and carried by the biased mainstream media as an unvetted and unelected candidate for President and that is a direct threat to American democracy.

Her facial and bodily reactions to Trump’s statements and her cackling and the fact she looked drunk tonight makes her look unpresidential. Her constant lying and the fact the “moderators” allowed her to lie tells you all you need to know about mainstream media bias and the mainstream media’s role in fake news and election interference. 

The best way to fix this crisis is to go out and vote Trump and vote for Republicans to Congress and vote for them in local races because the Democrat Party is not the political party of JFK but has become radicalized and is in dire need of reform. Just ask RFK, Jr! 

I say this as an unaffiliated voter whose family was born and raised as hard-core Democrats in a Blue state. 

DOJ Chief Admits Trump Indictments a Politically Motivated ‘Perversion of Justice’