I posted sometime yesterday on Facebook, Instagram and Parler a warning that one of President Trump’s obstacles in his legal battle against election fraud is that his team of lawyers will likely face lower court judges of a liberal or RINO persuasion. This is exactly what happened with the Obama-appointed judge in Pennsylvania who was faced with overwhelming evidence but nevertheless lied about the case he recklessly threw out and is therefore guilty of misconduct and playing partisan politics.
At least Trump’s lawyers can seek recourse including seeking a rehearing or if all else fails then bringing the case to a higher court.
Obama-appointed activist judges like the one who threw out the Trump case in Pennsylvania always rule against Trump or Republicans Their rulings are based on partiality and political prejudice and not on the evidence(s) of each case. These judges can and ought to be held accountable according to “28 U.S. Code § 144 - Bias or prejudice of judge”. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/144