Update: There are other ways Democrats steal recent elections and it has nothing to do with Dominion. . .
WAYNE ROOT: Fox News-Dominion Legal Settlement is Biggest Bait & Switch Scam in History
Update: A valid point the liberals on CNN and MSNBC who are celebrating the cowardly settlement by Fox News are overlooking is that Fox’s 2020 election coverage led by liberal Chris Wallace who as a “moderator” constantly interrupted President Trump while treating Joe Biden like Wallace and Biden were best friends during the first Presidential debate was deeply criticized by conservatives for its horrible election coverage so much that conservatives at that time decided to move on to conservative media outlets that favored President Trump and MAGA coverage.
Fox’s Neil Cavuto ended a broadcast of a press conference by then White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany when she addressed Trump’s voter fraud allegations after Election Day. (‘CNN and MSNBC dominate ratings after Election Day coverage, leaving Fox News in third place,’ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cnn-and-msnbc-dominate-ratings-after-election-day-coverage-leaving-fox-news-in-third-place)
Consider this article from November 10, 2020:
Fox News beginning to see massive conservative backlash following election coverage
It does not make sense for Fox to settle a case when it rarely raised questions concerning Election Day fraud and often silenced coverage of President Trump and his supporters who voiced election fraud allegations and other allegations including the Hunter Biden scandal which Chris Wallace and Fox News in general rejected as a legitimate concern.
Bill O’Reilly, formerly of Fox News, may be right when he says the reason Fox refused to fight is because Rupert Murdoch at 92 did not want to go through a trial and he likely told his lawyers to just make a deal and move on knowing that Fox’s most loyal viewership will stay and continue keeping the ratings up in spite of backlash received from Trump supporters and other conservatives.
———————
Excerpts:
5. Why did FOX not rely on the facts from its discovery? Eric Coomer, the former executive of Dominion, and many others had issues with the system, saying “our sh*t is just riddled with bugs”. Is that not totally damning in this case?
6. Why did FOX News not rely on the information available on Dominion discovered and reported by The Gateway Pundit and other publications before and after the 2020 Election?
6a. We know from the New Mexico auditafter the 2020 Election that the Dominion Auditing Machines can fill in ballots.
6b. We know from Tennessee and New Mexico that an erroneous code was found on Dominion voting machines. This came after the machines were reportedly certified.
6c. We know that Professor J. Alex Halderman, from the University of Michigan, audited Dominion Voting Machines in Georgia after the 2020 Election, and corrupt Obama Judge Totenberg will not to this day release this report. (Why did FOX News not demand to see this report?)
7. Why would FOX not demand an audit of the Dominion system by subject matter experts before agreeing to anything? This wouldn’t cost even a million dollars. Time after time Dominion and the government worked together to prevent audits of Dominion software after the election. In the corporate world, you wouldn’t think of certifying an audit without thoroughly analyzing the software impacting the scope of the audit. Why is this happening with any elections in the US?
——
Another legitimate question that ought to be raised is why didn’t Fox defend itself by addressing the multiple sworn affidavits voicing eye-witness accounts of voter fraud and why didn’t they seek the testimony of the former chair of the Federal Election Commission who in 2020 publicly stated, "I Do Believe There Is Fraud in These Places" ... "Makes This an Illegitimate Election.” (https://youtu.be/ilDwQrOYngE)
Fox should have compiled video testimony proving the possibility of voter fraud including the Dominion-Trained IT contractor who lit up a key Michigan Hearing by testifying, “They Were Re-Scanning, Counting Ballots 8 to 10 Times’. Then there is the Maricopa County evidence of an official caught on video admitting to election fraud.
Of course, the phony “fact-checkers” covered-up and twisted around these facts for the convenience of the Democrat Party.
Another question that could have been raised by Fox in its defense is that if Dominion is so neutral and fair then why is it so closely tied to the Democrat Party?
According to a report,
“Bloomberg reported in April of last year that Dominion Voting Systems hired a high-powered lobbying firm that includes a longtime aide to Pelosi. They hired Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account.
“In 2014, Dominion was listed in the Washington Post table as having donated between $25,001-$50,000 to the Clinton Foundation.” (https://www.worldtribune.com/dominion-voting-systems-tied-to-clintons-widely-used-in-battleground-states/)
And why didn’t Fox seek the services of law firms that would have defended their claims pro bono? This includes the Thomas More Society law firm.
From the Thomas More Society law firm:
“After allegations that Dominion Voting Systems had flipped votes in swing states — the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) — made a counter statement Nov. 12 disputing those allegations.
“CISA claimed ‘the November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.’
“All well and good, right? Wrong! Did you know Dominion Voting Systems is a member of CISA’s Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council? And Dominion is one of two entities that authored that statement put out by CISA.
“A company cannot testify on its own behalf. This calls into question the validity of that very testimony. Using this fake testimony as proof there is nothing to see here only shines the light of suspicion that much brighter.”
Fox should have brought up examples of how even liberal news outlets like the Providence Journal have questioned the legitimacy of elections in liberal states including Rhode Island where election fraud has been ongoing with zero transparency from leading election officials under the past three liberal governors.
There are more questions than answers that follow the ridiculous and inexcusable settlement made by Fox with Dominion. The far-Left may be gloating and filling the comment boxes of conservative news organizations like Newsmax all day and all night long (do these liberals work because they spend a lot of their time trolling conservatives 24/7?), but there are too many cases of voter fraud or irresponsible handling of voting machines and ballots that simply cannot be dismissed and overlooked by relying on what the majority of the mainstream liberal media and the phony and biased “fact-checkers” on Facebook and elsewhere say about elections. These are the same biased outlets that never say a word whenever Democrats like Hillary Clinton question the legitimacy of an election including the 2016 Presidential election.
Will it take several decades for the truth to come out as it did with the LBJ case?
"A study of Lyndon B. Johnson [Democrat] provides new evidence that the 36th President stole his first election to the United States Senate, in 1948. The book, 'Means of Ascent,' by Robert A. Caro, is the second volume of a projected four-volume study, 'The Years of Lyndon Johnson.'
SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/11/ us/how-johnson-won-election-he-d-lost.html
[More will be added to this post at a later date]