Tuesday, November 26, 2024

Diocese of Providence in Need of Reform

The Diocese of Providence and the chancery are in dire need of reform from the top. The appointments and hiring practices have been exceedingly unfair and discriminatory. 

There are too many cases of nepotism. 

Many good people I know earned Theology degrees a long time ago but they cannot get anywhere in the local diocese. They are ignored and treated like garbage while cliques are elevated and with much help from a suspended priest who was removed from ministry after credible allegations were publicized.  

One family is  treated by the diocese like they are royalty. They get whatever they want. The husband/father is principal of a school but he does not have the educational background for that position. When he was appointed, he (and his wife) had earned degrees but not in education or in theology. The former pastor favored him and let him do anything in the parish including teaching Theology without any degree or background even when other qualified laypeople were there with theology degrees but were neglected and disrespected.

Meanwhile, the young daughter of this man has a Theology degree. I was told she has a big position at the chancery and that this is the same chancery that a high level official there claimed a hiring freeze was in place in the diocese yet this girl was hired while many qualified people have been inquiring about a job in the diocese for years. Typical nepotism.

I talked with priests who are upset over this issue but there is nothing they can do to remedy the situation. 

The diocese needs reform and reforming the chancery would be a step in the right direction but that won’t happen, unfortunately, at this time because of the current roadblocks and the widespread abuse of nepotism. A new bishop is expected to be appointed in the next few months. Will he be a holy and wise bishop who will have the courage to impose reform or will he stick with the status quo as our previous bishops have done? 


Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Will Rhode Islanders Do the Right Thing Now?




Rhode Island has suffered significantly from economic woes, a costly, corrupt and radicalized education system, a lack of new and promising business enterprises, a wave of illegal immigrants who get better care all-around than lifelong citizens, a suspicious voter rolls system that has more voters than citizens (even the liberal Providence Journal sued the state for its lack of transparency on this scandal), and rising crime and widespread graffiti that has plagued our cities, especially Providence, ad nauseam.

But Rhode Island voters share much of the blame for their failed state because they keep voting for the same failed liberal politicians like Sen. Sheldon “Dark Money” Whitehouse but then complain about the horrible condition the state has been in for a long time. If Patricia Morgan does not defeat Whitehouse then that will be a shame because Rhode Island is dying for a fresh change from decades of failure and corruption. 

The Democrats have controlled Rhode Island for too long with nothing but horrible results. Morgan will keep her promises and not be a sell out like Whitehouse. Whitehouse has repeatedly told the debunked myth about Republicans and Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, he accepted and promoted a false accusation against then Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh from a constituent who later recanted and apologized but Whitehouse never apologized not even to Kavanaugh, he claims to be anti-dark money but he has well-documented ties to secret donors while he never helps to fix Rhode Island’s economic problems and poor business status. He only cares about enriching his pockets and flooding his campaigns and agendas with dark money. 

Rhode Island always lists poorly among business-friendly states and for jobs. It was once a state known as the jewelry capital of the world and where entrepreneurs thrived without big government interference but now all you see is a state that  shelters and supports illegals and pushes away or suppresses her own citizens. 

It is up to you Rhode Island. Make a change today or quit complaining about the terrible and embarrassing condition of your state because no one likes to hear someone whining about something that is their own fault. 


Tuesday, October 1, 2024

I Hope I am wrong but expect the VP debate tonight to be biased in favor of Walz

 Republicans fail to take a stand when they agree with televised debates because these debates are always held on liberal news networks with “moderators” who are biased and liberal. At least Trump finally took a stand after the extremely biased debate with Harris on ABC when he said a second debate should take place on Fox News with moderators like Sean Hannity but Harris, of course, rejected this offer because she will only agree to a debate if it occurs on friendly territory. 

I do not expect the VP debate tonight to be fair and balanced. I hope I am wrong but these liberal news networks are working almost 24/7 to carry and coddle Harris-Walz to the finish line. The latest stats show that Harris-Walz receive nearly 100% positive coverage from these networks whereas Trump-Vance receive almost 100% negative coverage.

If their political opponents don’t want to agree to balance the debates out then Republicans should refuse televised debates in the future because they are not worth the time and effort.


Thursday, September 26, 2024

Biden appears on The View and says Harris shares responsibility for their failures while Harris says prices are ”just too high” during a campaign event in Pennsylvania


Harris admits costs in US are ‘just too high’ — as Trump taunts her inaction: ‘They’ve done nothing’


Is Joe Biden bitter about being forced by his own party to quit his bid for re-election? He recently wore a Trump hat at the urging of a Trump supporter and he wore it with a gleeful smile and now he just appeared on The View and admitted that he delegated his responsibility as President re: foreign and domestic policies to Kamala Harris. 

Last Sumner, Biden’s polling numbers were so bad and criticisms of his handling of the economy and foreign policy were coming from voters from all political persuasions that there was no doubt he was going to lose to Trump in a landslide. The sure signs of dementia did not favor him as well. 

But if Harris shares the responsibility of the Biden administration’s failures as Biden himself admitted then the same voters who were not going to vote for Biden should not vote for Harris because Biden put her in charge of implementing the failures that have hurt America in many ways. 

The media and so-called “fact-checkers” went crazy for Harris by defending her when it was pointed out that Harris was the border czar appointed by Biden. Her defenders said this was “false information” but Biden himself admitted on The View that he delegated all responsibility, all powers to Harris! 

This is the type of development that will motivate independent voters and even some Democrats to vote for Trump. Trump was already receiving endorsements from Democrats including a Democrat mayor. They see weakness and irresponsibility in Biden and Harris and the fact that Harris cannot intelligently answer questions on issues like the economy or about the horrendous border situation. 

And then there is the threat of Russia and China because the latter and former have increased their military activity near Alaska. They see the Biden administration as weak and without any reaction except indifference with regard to foreign threats. This explains why the Biden administration has no problem with other foreign threats including unvetted and dangerous immigrants who have flooded our nation. 

A Kamala Harris win in November would be a colossal loss for America. It would tell the nation and the world that failure, weakness and lawfare are now the norm and that voters were influenced by anti-Trump news organizations and interviewers who coddled and carried Harris all the way to the finish line. 

Biden Administration Official Says Trump Should be “Extinguished”. Will the FBI and Secret Service At Least Question Her?

 Biden’s commerce chief says ‘let’s extinguish’ Trump ‘for good’ — after two attempted assassinations of ex-prez

Gina Raimondo, the former governor of Rhode Island and the current Commerce Secretary for the Biden administration, made a dangerous and inflammatory statement calling for Trump to be “extinguished”. She said, 

“How did we get here? Let’s extinguish him for good,” the former Rhode Island governor said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe”. 

She may have intended to discourage people from voting for Trump but her comment has a double-meaning knowing that Trump has faced two confirmed assassination attempts along with published reports of scheming groups who want him killed. 

Why use words she knows is the type of threatening language that has been commonly pointed out as language that inspires anti-Trump critics to voice approval of violence against Trump and his supporters? 

The people who attempted to assassinate Trump and others who are scheming to commit an act of violence against him and his supporters hear a Biden administration official make a statement like Raimondo did and think it is a personal message for them to physically attack Trump or to post a similar statement just to spread “hope” for the murder of Trump. I have seen many posts on Facebook that support violence against Trump but these posts are never censored. Facebook is too busy censoring posts only by Conservatives. That is typical of Facebook’s far left bias! 

Does Raimondo not understand that untrue and violent remarks against Trump including calls by the Left during the past several years for acts of violence against him, especially assassination, have been discouraged and condemned even by some of her fellow Democrats? Her choice of words was simultaneously irresponsible and criminal. 

Raimondo was my former governor. She was a failure and an advocate for anything that opposed the Natural Moral Law, ethics, and Catholic moral teaching while claiming to be Catholic. 

She infamously failed to reform DCYF and then there was the scandal of Point Judith Capital, a company she founded, which she abused for her own benefit but at the expense of Rhode Island’s state workers.

On abortion, she signed in 2019 a radical abortion expansion bill that supports abortion at any stage and for any reason. It also undermines Rhode Island’s ability to regulate abortion facilities. A letter from Rhode Island’s Department of Health in 2018 revealed that the state’s abortion facilities have not been inspected thus proving the fact that abortion is the most unregulated business in America. This is what Raimondo supports. She (along with the equally corrupt Rhode Island legislature) does not have any moral integrity or any love and concern for the most vulnerable. She ended her term as governor with Rhode Island ranked and still ranked as one of the worst states for tax burden, personal income, business and education.

Therefore, it does not surprise me that she would use the word “exterminate” with regard to Trump. She is another extreme liberal lacking a moral compass. If she lacks empathy for her fellow citizens and for the unborn babies who are mutilated in abortion then she would surely lack empathy for Trump should he get assassinated or, in her words, “extinguished”.

She should immediately resign and make public reparation because not doing so will give the impression that it is normal for a person of influence to use harsh language that may incite political violence or at least encourage passion for political violence.








Sunday, September 22, 2024

Kamala is Proving She is a Coward

Kamala Harris not only refuses to attend the Al Smith Dinner because she fears being roasted and publicly humiliated by Trump (the charity event takes place every major election year. The two Presidential candidates give speeches and roast each other which is customary of the Al Smith Dinner), but she only wants to debate Trump on her own terms and on friendly territory while rejecting Trump’s proposal to debate him on Fox News with Conservatives like Sean Hannity serving as moderators to balance the recent biased and corrupt debate on ABC which was led by two moderators who never fact-checked Harris even when she mentioned horrible lies about Trump including one common lie that even the liberal SNOPES debunked a long time ago.

She now has proposed a second debate except this time she wants one on CNN. She thought she was being shrewd when she said Trump should not have any objection to a debate on CNN because he praised how CNN handled his debate with Joe Biden in June. But CNN’s political coverage has proved it is doing all it can to carry and coddle Harris without scrutiny which means there is no guarantee CNN will be fair and honest in a debate and not work like they are volunteers for the Harris-Walz campaign. 

CNN always nitpicks at Trump and twists everything he says and does and engages in character assassination while they are soft on Harris because they are trying to get her elected. Trump would be dumb to walk into that hornet’s nest if he changed his mind concerning the aforementioned debate proposal on CNN.

‘Groceries Still Too High’: Kamala Harris Undermines Her Own Economic Record

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2024/09/17/groceries-still-too-high-kamala-harris-undermines-her-own-economic-record/

Why would anyone vote for Kamala Harris knowing that a vote for her is a careless and self-defeating endorsement of the poor economic record of the Biden-Harris era? Does anyone learn from history anymore? 

Her proposed economic plan was severely criticized even by people from the Clinton and Obama administrations and by leading liberal commentators and by far-Left news organizations as radically un-American and not in favor of either business owners or consumers.

She is clueless with regard to the supply-and-demand chain and why business owners are forced to drive up prices.  

Related: 

Harris and Biden’s legacy? Inflation, debt, and a leaderless nation



Wednesday, September 18, 2024

When Peter Doocy Questions Karine Jean-Pierre

 I like Peter Doocy’s questions and comments that he presents to the White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre. They are based on hard facts and they are meant to incite an angry and defensive response but my one problem with Doocy is that he fails to defend himself or fact-check Karine or counter her lies using the White House’s own record against them. 

She recently lied countless times about Trump when Doocy mentioned the second assassination attempt against him and the fact that the White House’s rhetoric and the rhetoric by many liberals have inspired many people to call for Trump’s assassination or some type of violence against him or his supporters (Trump supporters have already been injured or murdered in the past). 

Karine brought up many lies and myths about J6, for example, that were easy to refute but Doocy just let her ramble on instead of correcting her. She even lied about Doocy and attacked him and he still did not fight back against her rhetoric. 

He simply needs to change his style and comeback with answers that can easily stump her and throw her off-guard. If I can do it (if I had the opportunity) then he should be able to do it better than I can because he has more of an advantage and all the information that he can research and use against Karine. 

Sunday, September 15, 2024

Social Media Has Not Addressed The Anti-Trump Rhetoric That Encourages Attempted Assassination Attempts Against Him!

 I often scroll through social media comments on popular Facebook pages that are pro-Trump and it is horrible to see the massive amount of false information against him in the form of comments or memes but what is even more horrible are the comments or memes that call for his assassination or hope that he will die soon. These posts have been reported but are never censored or deleted by Facebook. A lot of these commenters are “bots” that Facebook purposely has put in place to manipulate conversations or to counter political posts that are pro-Trump. 

Ask Meta AI and it will admit that Facebook has bots posting comments in response to groups and pages. Facebook has automated systems and fake accounts known as “sock puppets” to manipulate conversations, promote specific agendas, and spread misinformation. This is frequently a problem throughout leading groups and pages that are pro-Trump. These accounts are never censored or removed even though they are clearly fake and spread false information or favor Trump’s assassination or a quick death of him of any kind. 

It is this type of toxic environment along with the rhetoric and lawfare by leaders in the Democrat Party that encourages the targeting of Trump for assassination. Look at all of the quotes and memes by celebrities, professors, politicians, et al., during the past seven or eight years that promoted or depicted the assassination of Trump! 

And the mainstream media like CNN or ABC has much blame pointed at them as well because they often fuel this rhetoric. It is irresponsible and criminal and blood will be on their hands if another assassination attempt on Trump turns out to be deadly. 

Thursday, September 12, 2024

Kamala Cheated! Wireless Audio Earrings Company Responds to Rumors Kamala Harris Wore Earpiece During Presidential Debate

Just The News reported:

Following the presidential debate on Tuesday, social media users theorized that Vice President Kamala Harris wore audio earrings on stage. The Germany-based company that sells the earrings said on Wednesday that the resemblance between Harris’ earrings and their audio earrings “is striking.”

“We do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it,” Malte Iversen, managing director at Icebach Sound, told Just the News on Wednesday. 

“To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign. The choice of colour is a bit challenging though as orange does not go well with a lot of colours.

“Currently, we are unfortunately out of stock and also busy preparing a lawsuit against a big Chinese tech company breaching our patents,” Iversen continued. “We are talking to investors in order to ramp up operations accordingly and are confident that we will ship again very soon.”

https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/company-responds-theory-harris-wore-audio-earrings-pres-debate-resemblance-striking

Of course, the fake and biased “fact-checkers” on Facebook are countering posts that accuse Kamala of wearing audio earrings. They are contradicted by the company that produces them. These “fact-checkers” are simply a branch of the Democrat Party. They are guilty of censoring free speech and censoring anything that makes Democrats look bad and they are guilty of election interference. They never censor anything posted by liberals. They are falsely called “independent fact-checkers” but that is false advertising that Mark Zuckerberg ought to correct because it is not true. 


Wednesday, September 11, 2024

Trump won the debate but he should have not agreed to it and Harris lying and being coddled and bailed out by “moderators” does not equal a “win” for her!

Kamala Harris is close friends with a top executive, Dana Walden,  who helps operate a company that oversees ABC News! 😡 This may explain precisely why the “moderators” during the debate last night were exceedingly hard on Trump but soft on Harris and constantly lied for her and gave her relief as needed.

Trump did as well as he could during the debate considering he was debating three people. I could understand why he would lose his composure. Anyone in his position last night would have acted the exact same way or worse. I would have walked off the stage after the moderators failed to fact-checked Harris and allowed her to finish her statements and allowed only her and not Trump to have follow-up responses. 

If people say she “won” then that would be like saying a sports team that was aided by corrupt referees “won” but cheating and favoring one side over the other is not “winning” but lying. 

The fake and biased “moderators” at ABC ought to be ashamed because they deliberately steered the debate in favor of Harris but she lost her credibility on her own with her arrogant facial expressions and body language including the sarcastic gesture of placing her hand under her chin while staring at Trump with a sardonic and bizarre look on her face. That look was creepy and unpresidential.

I thought  before the debate that Trump was wrong to agree with a debate on a network that is exceedingly anti-Trump. He should have learned his lesson from what happened in 2016 and especially in 2020. Another reason he should have avoided ABC is the fact he is suing ABC and George Stephanopoulos. A judge ruled this year that the case will go forward. This meant that the debate was never going to be fair and balanced like his CNN debate with Joe Biden in June. 

If Harris refuses to debate Trump on a news network like Fox News then he should counter her by refusing to debate her on enemy territory where she will always be coddled and bailed-out by “moderators” and know the line of questions beforehand. Last night’s questions for her, by the way, closely followed her standard stump speech. 

The entire debate was terrible but at least Trump finished very well with his closing remarks. Trump did as well as he could during the debate considering he was debating three people. I could understand why he would lose his composure. Anyone in his position last night would have acted the exact same way or worse. I would have walked off the stage after the moderators failed to fact-checked Harris and allowed her to finish her statements and allowed only her and not Trump to have follow-up responses. 

If people say she “won” then that would be like saying a sports team that was aided by corrupt referees “won” but cheating and favoring one side over the other is not “winning” but lying. 

The fake and biased “moderators” at ABC ought to be ashamed because they deliberately steered the debate in favor of Harris but she lost her credibility on her own with her arrogant facial expressions and body language including the sarcastic gesture of placing her hand under her chin while staring at Trump with a sardonic and bizarre look on her face. That look was creepy and unpresidential.

I thought  before the debate that Trump was wrong to agree with a debate on a network that is exceedingly anti-Trump. He should have learned his lesson from what happened in 2016 and especially in 2020. Another reason he should have avoided ABC is the fact he is suing ABC and George Stephanopoulos. A judge ruled this year that the case will go forward. This meant that the debate was never going to be fair and balanced like his CNN debate with Joe Biden in June. 

If Harris refuses to debate Trump on a news network like Fox News then he should counter her by refusing to debate her on enemy territory where she will always be coddled and bailed-out by “moderators” and know the line of questions beforehand. Last night’s questions for her, by the way, closely followed her standard stump speech. 

The entire debate was terrible but at least Trump finished very well with his closing remarks.

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

The “Debate” was a three against one biased attack in favor of Harris

 I never thought President Trump should have agreed to debate Kamala on an ultra-liberal news network that hates him with a passion and constantly nitpicks at everything about him. Harris has family linked to ABC and so there is a widespread conflict of interest there and plus Trump has a lawsuit against ABC which is why having a debate on ABC was not a good idea but I give him credit because he is fighting on enemy territory.

At least the CNN debate in June between Trump and Biden was fair even though CNN is just as liberal and biased as ABC but the moderators did not coddle and carry Biden but asked questions that benefited both Trump and Biden and they did not attack Trump or Biden or make the debate about themselves. 

Why did ABC purposely make tonight’s debate one-sided? And please do not say she “won”. A team does not actually “win” when the referees rig the game in favor of the opponent they want to “win”. Trump faced three opponents tonight and not just one opponent. 

The “moderators” clearly worked to assist and carry Kamala Harris. She was allowed to complete her answers whereas Trump often was cut off or interrupted as a way to slow or stop his momentum. 

The “moderators” were soft on her and allowed her to lie while they pressed Trump and even attempted to “fact-check” him.

Kamala was undoubtedly coached with the questions before the debate. And the line of questions addressed to her by the “moderators” followed her stump speech and this gave her an unfair advantage. 

To be fair and balanced, she should agree to a debate with Conservatives serving as moderators like Sean Hannity and Mark Levin but she does not have the courage to face Trump with Conservative moderators which is why she rejected a debate on Fox News. 

Kamala knows that on a liberal, anti-Trump network she will be prepped by the network itself and then treated very well by the “moderators”. 

The same biased treatment happened against Trump in 2016 and 2020. I know he likes to go in the lion’s den and fight the fight of a gladiator but it is unfair when Kamala refuses to even the playing field by refusing to face Trump, not even once, with Conservative serving as moderators. 

Kamala is being coddled and carried by the biased mainstream media as an unvetted and unelected candidate for President and that is a direct threat to American democracy.

Her facial and bodily reactions to Trump’s statements and her cackling and the fact she looked drunk tonight makes her look unpresidential. Her constant lying and the fact the “moderators” allowed her to lie tells you all you need to know about mainstream media bias and the mainstream media’s role in fake news and election interference. 

The best way to fix this crisis is to go out and vote Trump and vote for Republicans to Congress and vote for them in local races because the Democrat Party is not the political party of JFK but has become radicalized and is in dire need of reform. Just ask RFK, Jr! 

I say this as an unaffiliated voter whose family was born and raised as hard-core Democrats in a Blue state. 

Saturday, August 17, 2024

Actor Wrongfully Convicted of Murder by Kamala Harris Says He’s Voting for Trump: ‘Life Was Good’ Under Trump


Excerpt:

“I never forget when I turned around and I looked and I seen Kamala Harris, you know, we locked eyes there this one time, and she….. and she laughed,” Trulove said. “She literally just, like, kind of bust out laughing, almost as if she was pointing at it, like, ha, ha, ha, ha. That’s how I felt though.”
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2024/08/17/actor-wrongfully-convicted-of-murder-by-kamala-harris-says-hes-voting-for-trump-life-was-good-under-trump/


Watch this video (posted below). 

It is a deeply informative interview with an innocent man Kamala Harris sent to prison. He won a $13.1 million settlement for his wrongful conviction.

Of course, the fake and biased "fact-checkers" like "Politifact" have twisted this story around just to make their liberal and cackling icon look good to the public. It is a shame these spin doctors cannot tell the truth especially with regard to an innocent man whom Kamala not only sent to prison but attended his conviction and sentencing to arrogantly show support for his unjust punishment.

                                           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bgjm6xPJeaA

Friday, August 16, 2024

Why Polling Data Favoring Kamala Harris Cannot Be Trusted



NewsMax recently published the results of a New York Times poll showing Kamala Harris leading in three key battleground states over President Trump.

Just a few days prior, Trump was leading Harris in these battleground states in a poll conducted by the historically accurate Democracy Institute (Espinal, N. (2024, August 7). Exclusive poll shows Donald Trump leads Kamala Harris in three key swing states. Daily Expresss US. https://bit.ly/3yEKDrg), but the New York Times is trying to influence likeky voters by putting a spin on this good news for Trump and his campaign. They err by oversampling their polling data. This is typical of the New York Times and other mainstream liberal and “Never-Trumper” media outlets.

The Democracy Institute poll "was conducted with a telephone survey of 1,200 likely voters, split as 35 percent Democrats, 35 percent Republican, and 30 percent Independent. The data set has a five percent margin of error" (Ibid.), but the poll was not published by NewsMax. They published, instead, the results of the New York Times poll! This is the same ultra-liberal media outlet (New York Times) that claimed Hillary was ahead of Trump in the national polling average on Election Day in 2016! They claimed she had an 85% chance of winning the election. On October 18, 2016, the New York Times claimed she had a 91% chance of winning the election whereas Trump had only a 9% chance! (Katz, J. (2016, October 18). Presidential Forecast - Hillary has a 91% chance to win. The New York Times. https://shorturl.at/jN6cI).

At that time, the New York Times claimed that “Mrs. Clinton’s current lead in the national popular vote is around 6 to 7 points and growing” 

They created and still create their own confirmation bias. The bias back then was just as abhorrent as it is now. They attempt the subjugation of a large enough voting bloc to influence the Presidential election. This has been a growing trend going back to the 2000 Presidential election. 



Media outlets not only produce fake polls but at the same time they unashamedly show hostility in their reporting on the Republican nominee for President.

A study revealed in 2016 that 91% of U.S. media coverage was hostile to Trump. The study reviewed 588 news stories on ABC, CBS, NBC (Noyes, R. (2016, October 25). MRC Study: Documenting TV’s Twelve Weeks of Trump Bashing. Media Research Center. https://shorturl.at/UbmiG). 

The study proved how the major media was colluding with the Hillary Clinton campaign to spin the election in her favor. This allowed her to have the unfair advantage of constant mainstream media coverage in her favor compared to her opponent. 

A similar study in 2020 revealed the negative coverage was slightly worse (Noyes, R. (2020, October 27). Never More Biased: TV Blasts Trump with 92% Negative Coverage; 66% Positive for Biden. Media Research Center. https://shorturl.at/DE9BS).

Nothing has changed since 2016 and 2020. It is arguably much worse now because of the lawfare schemes orchestrated against Trump by the Democrats with backing by their friends in the Der Stürmer

Pravda-like, mainstream media.

It is disturbing to see the mainstream media and also the social media and their union with the fake and biased “independent fact-checkers” constantly claim elections are not tainted with bias or interference when they obsessively provide negative coverage for Trump and nitpick him while they coddle Harris. They are doing all they can in their power to carry Harris to the finish line as the “victor” while she purposely avoids press conferences and interviews because she knows the major networks are manipulatively working to twist and mislead and whitewash on her behalf. It is basically the 2024 version of the “basement Joe” strategy. 

But back to the topic of polls…

I knew back in 2016 the polls showing Hillary was going to “win” were fake. I cited reliable and consistent polling data that proved without a doubt that Trump was going to win the election. I posted on the very day of the election reliable data that revealed the two most accurate polls of 2012 predicted Trump was going to win the 2016 election.

Back in August 2016, it was reported that pollsters were loading the polls with Democrats to give Hillary a “lead” over Trump (Durden, T. (2016, July 31). Hillary Lead Over Trump Surges After Reuters ‘Tweaks’ Poll. Zero Hedge. https://shorturl.at/jnOeP).

Trump was far ahead in the polls until the media decided to interfere with the election with their negative reporting and their fake and biased polling numbers. This is why by August they claimed Hillary was suddenly “ahead” of Trump.





The same dishonest and malicious trend is happening in 2024. It is entirely meant to sway the Presidential election especially by discouraging and suppressing likely Trump voters and to create a bandwagon effect by encouraging undecided voters to vote for Harris.

Forbes, a fake Conservative and Never-Trumper media company, just cited a survey by Monmouth University claiming Harris leads Trump by 5 points (Dorn, S. (2024, August 15). Forbes Magazine. Trump Vs. Harris 2024 Polls: Harris Up 5 In Latest Survey. https://shorturl.at/Uz9NU).

This is the same Monmouth University that had Hillary ahead of Trump by 7 points among registered voters and by 8 points among likely voters in June 2016 (Monmouth University Polling Institute. (2016. June 20). Clinton Leads Trump by 7. Monmouth University. https://tinyurl.com/4y6ykdvf) and by as much as 6 points on Election Day in 2016 (Monmouth University Polling Institute. (2016, November 7). Most expect Clinton to win, few believe system is rigged. Monmouth University. https://tinyurl.com/368yyn4m).

They are playing us for a fool.

There are polls that show Trump is ahead but they don’t receive
 much attention. One recent survey of over 1000 likely voters has Trump ahead of Harris by only 2 points (Crilly. R. (2024, August 14). Trump leads Harris by two points in Daily Mail poll... as voters reveal their biggest hesitation about Kamala. The Daily Mail. https://tinyurl.com/3m3dardn). 

It is probable that Trump is ahead in national polling data like he was in 2016 irregardless of the data at that time claiming Hillary was going to crush Trump on Election Day. 

Every voter, notwithstanding his or her political proclivities, should be alarmed over how a confluence of Democrats and the media use polls in a pernicious scheme to manipulate elections and how the latter and former are misleading a large voting bloc. 

Voters ought be cognizant of the hard facts and compare this election year to 2016 because they are strikingly similar. I am certain that in October a media outlet like the New York Times will falsely claim Harris has a 95% chance of beating Trump but they may be disappointed as they were in 2016. 

Trump has to ignore the data by relentlessly exposing the failures of the Biden-Harris administration and he has to constantly portray the Harris-Walz ticket as incompetent and too radical for America. Trump ought to display equanimity in interviews and debates for him to have an efficacious outcome on Election Day. He needs to avoid repeating a 2024 version of the 2020 Samantha Guthrie interview (she was unprofessional, rude and biased. She is always soft on Democrats and plays spin doctor for them). 



It is hard to believe that in spite of the ongoing media bias working to promote Harris that she is either ahead of Trump or almost tied with him when you consider the fact she is not relatable to mainstream voters, her own staff at the White House dislike her, her Presidential campaign in 2020 failed because she had trouble trying to explain her political policies and why she is running for President. In 2024, she still cannot explain her agenda and explain why she is running. All you get from her is repeated word-salad and annoying cackling. Her innumerable failures and radicalism and un-American policies and just her general viewpoints are sheer evil. 

Harris represents as a public figure all that has gone wrong in the modern world. She advocates moral relativism, secular humanism, socialism, radical feminism, Hegelian pragmatic morality, situation ethics, proportionalism (which denies the existence of intrinsically evil acts), and the dehumanizing and savage destruction of the unborn. On February 25, 2020, Senator Harris voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act which means she also has no problem with infanticide.)

Trump is not perfect but his record shows he is not owned by the Deep State or by the culture of death. His actions led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade, “Planned Parenthood” and other pro-abortion organizations absolutely hate him, he sided with the Little Sisters of the Poor while the fallen-away Catholic Joe Biden fought against them, he has worked to destroy the Deep State while they seek to destroy him through lawfare schemes, and he negotiated peace deals which have been severely compromised by the anti-Semitic Democrats including the Biden-Harris administration and by the Harris-Walz ticket.

Lastly, the only way for our country to rebound and purify our nation is by returning to God and obeying His commandments and then we will see much healing from the true head of our lives. 

As 2 Chronicles 7:14 says, 

“If My people who are called by My name humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.”

—Coemgenus 


Monday, July 29, 2024

Mainstream Media, So-Called "Independent Fact-Checkers" Are Working Overtime To Fix The 2024 Presidential Election

The mainstream media, of which a majority of them are pro-Democrat Party, are aggressively promoting the presumptive Presidential nominee of the Democrat Party with lies, cover-ups and far-fetched stories to rewrite and overhype her reputation. They did the same thing in the past, especially in 1992, 1996, 2008, 2012, 2016, and in a much more radical way, in 2020. 

2020 was the worst going by visual proof and going by statistics based on research. A study was done that showed nearly 92% of the broadcast coverage of President Trump in 2020 was negative compared to the 66% of positive coverage for Joe Biden ("Broadcast networks deliver 92% negative coverage for Trump, 66% positive for Biden: Study," https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/27/study-biased-broadcast-networks-92-negative-trump/).

Whenever Trump was interviewed in 2020 on network tv by someone like NBC's Savannah Guthrie (Yes, she is talented and beautiful but she is a typical liberal and politically biased) the person interviewing him was always anatagnonistic, disruptive, rude, deceitful and always brought up lies and half-truths against him that were clearly straight from the usual talking-points of radicalized Democrats like Biden, Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer, Nadler and others of like mind. 

The media back in 2020 did all they could to carry the Biden-Harris ticket to the White House. They fixed the election in that way because they fed their audiences everything that could spin the election against Trump. They created a false narrative that gave America an election that was compromised by extreme media bias. If you recall, the media helped to expose Biden's plagiarism scandal back in the late 80's which ultimately forced him to end his campaign for the White House, but in 2020 and again in 2024 they failed to mention this fact to potential voters. The media is different now because there are many radical leftists who infiltrated the media and who are not fair and balanced like their predecessors were a few decades ago.

They cover-up all of the scandals involving both Biden and Harris including the fact that records show that Biden did, in fact, assign the role of "border cszar" to Harris!

1. 
Megyn Kelly Reveals How Media Called Kamala Harris "Border Czar" Before It Became a Talking Point
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/EJDPNqTinto

2.
Mainstream media 'gaslighting' the public on Kamala Harris as 'border czar' 
https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/mainstream-media-gaslighting-the-public-on-kamala-harris-as-border-czar/video/0867741dfe84fa66ea0fe1797b56522c

3. Video: ‘Orwellian’ media denies Kamala Harris was border czar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsbzZrjHIEE

4. Media suddenly changes its tune on calling Kamala Harris the ‘border czar’ — despite giving her the title
https://nypost.com/2024/07/24/us-news/media-change-tune-on-calling-kamala-harris-border-czar-despite-giving-her-the-title/

5. Inside the plot to gaslight Americans about Kamala and re-write her story... and it starts with insisting she was never 'Border Czar' or the 'most liberal' Senator
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13673147/plot-gaslight-americans-kamala-harris-border-czar.html

 
One of many of the other lies the media is spreading is that Trump's economy was poor and caused a record amount of unemployment. Do they think we are stupid? Well, they know their viewers won't bother researching the facts! They fail to remind their audiences that the loss of jobs had nothing to do with Trump's ecomonic policies but with the Covid virus followed by the lockdowns which forced businesses to close or to stay partially opened. The virus and the lockdowns effected not just the USA but the entire world. Trump had warned the USA and the world about the Covid virus at the SOTU address in 2020 
(
Biden lies, says President Trump didn't talk about virus during SOTU,” https://youtu.be/O-MfHeucQT) but this was met with harsh criticisms by Democrats who condemned him for his warning and publicly denied the threat of the virus. He was called a "racist" or a "xenephobe" for his travel bans, Pelosi was in Chinatown in San Francisco downplaying his warning by actually encourging people to ignore his warning and to go out in the public where she said they would be "safe". Pelosi and other Democrats downplayed the seriousness of the virus after the SOTU just because they wanted to contradict Trump and make him look like an irrational alarmists (Proof: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLfcsCL61Hs&list=PLBjTg68btezdaCGmW62B41g2qWL67fKlo&index=10 .

But the media fails to point out the fact that Trump's economy prior to Covis was strong with record-breaking results 
("Census Report Shows How Jaw-Dropping Trump’s Economy Was Before Shutdowns," https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/22/census-report-shows-how-jaw-dropping-trumps-economy-was-before-shutdowns/)


The so-called "independent fact-checkers", of course, are just a bad as the mainstream media because they fail to censor the fake news against Trump that is being propagated throughout social media. They are too busy trying to help Harris and so this means they are in line with the attacks on Trump and the propaganda of the mainstream media.

This is a threat to the integrity of our election process and it undermines the purpose and the reputation of the media, both mainstream and social. It hurts people of all political persuasions.

The lawfare against Trump is a byproduct of this systematic problem. It will only get worse. It has included attacks by Democrats on our own branches of government. Look at what Biden is proposing now concerning the Supreme Court! He wants to overhaul the Supreme Court only because Democrats are sore losers over decisions the highest court in the land has made in the past couple of years including decisions against the Biden administration.

Biden and the Democrats want to move the goalposts and change the laws and rules to favor only their agenda and enforce a banana republic. This means they want to butcher the Constitution. This is also a byproduct of the aforementioned systematic problem.

If voters want someone in the White House who will defend our Constitution and our patriotic way of life that many Presidents defended in the past including Republicans and Democrats like President Kennedy and President Reagan then the only leading candidate for President that deserves our vote is Donald J. Trump.

Harris is too radical, too liberal, too much of a failure (she failed with the border and she supported the failed policies and executive orders of Biden that led us to inflation and to a weak and dangerous foreign policy) and she is too much of a cackling person with a serious 'word salad' problem to become President of the United States of America, chief executive of the federal government, and commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

Harris was not even voted for by the citizens in a primary because Biden was forced to withdraw from the Presidential race. She replaced Biden by default and as an unelected appointment only because Biden was failing against Trump in all the polls and failed miserably in their debate, but it is both of their records and their asinine view of the USA and their lack of support for our friend Israel and their insane immigration crisis along with their views on men competing in women's sports and their liberal views on energy and on the supply and demand chain that has hurt our pockets and our way of life and also our standing in the world.  



.   

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

Will the New York Jury Let Left-Wing bias Influence their Decision in the Trump Trial?

Sensible people know that so far the judicial cases against President Trump in New York, orchestrated by the Democrats and by Biden’s DOJ, have been biased and unfairly tainted with radical leftist judges, prosecutors with links to the Democrat Party and to radical groups, and covered by a mainstream media that makes Tokyo Rose look like a fair minded lady! 

These cases conveniently came up at a time when there were calls by the left to assassinate Trump or indict him for any reason. Far-Left DA’s vowed as a campaign promise to “get Trump” just to appease the hate against him by the radical leftists who oppose Trump for appointing Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade and for openly declaring war on the Deep State and its cronies. If you recall, Senator Chuck Schumer (D., NY) warned that Trump will surely face repercussions for daring to expose the Deep State and its ties to the government. He specifically mentioned on January 3, 2017, just two months after Trump’s election, that the intelligence agencies can be weaponized against political  opponents. He said, “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” (Schumer told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/312605-schumer-trump-being-really-dumb-by-going-after-intelligence-community/)

If Trump is not a victim of the lawfare that is being orchestrated by the highest levels of the government then why did Schumer admit that the intelligence community could go after Trump and destroy him just because he disagreed with them and hurt their feelings?

This also has much to do with a 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton when Trump suggested she should be in prison. I knew immediately when he made that quip that he was in trouble. The endless chant “lock her up” at his rallies motivated the always vengeful Hillary and the Democrats to target Trump and to do whatever it would take to destroy him. 

But the Stormy Daniels case should bring an innocent verdict even though the case was tainted from the start and run by a prosecutorial team and a judge clearly not on side of Trump and the GOP. It really should have been thrown out by the judge. 

Bringing in Michael Cohen as a key witness for the Prosecution was a colossal failure! His testimony alone should bring an innocent verdict. He was already known as a perjurer. He admitted on the stand he had an agenda to embezzle Trump! The fact he admitted to the crime of theft was actually the only crime that was mentioned throughout the trial! It is Cohen who should be prosecuted! What was the Prosecution thinking!? The Defense easily attacked his credibility and made the Prosecution and its entire case look foolish. 

And then Stormy Daniels lied on the stand and contradicted over and over again her “story”. And even the liberal Bill Maher showed a clip of an interview he had with her that showed how what she said on the stand strongly contradicted the story she told to Maher.

Then there was the outright lie, repeated endlessly by the media, that this was a “hush” money case. No, there was a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) between both parties. This is a legal agreement. 

Stormy already lost to Trump in a previous case of which she lost a defamation lawsuit and was ordered to pay Trump $122,000’s legal fees. She has a shady and sleazy past and, therefore, has absolutely no credibility to go after Trump. 

If Democrats think the charges against Trump and all the lawfare cases against him are true then why did they suddenly invent these cases all on their own AFTER they failed to bring him down using the fake Russia dossier and by using milllions of tax dollars during the failed Mueller investigation? They were so angry over Mueller’s results that they illegally charged Trump with crimes that were never committed. They even moved the goal posts around and made misdemeanor’s into felonies just to “get Trump”. 

The current state of the USA is tyrannical with a corrupt DOJ that relentlessly goes after not only Trump but this is the same corrupt DOJ that deems the Pro-Life cause as a “terrorist threat” including Pro-Life moms as “potential terrorists (“Documents Show Biden Admin Considers Pro-Life Moms Potential Domestic Terrorists,” https://buff.ly/41rQHf0).

The Democrats lack a clear and informed conscience rooted in Faith and Reason. They have not been the same political party since the moment President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963. They became radicalized in the 60’s and 70’s with many fallen-away Catholics like Ted Kennedy. Joe Biden, and Nancy Pelosi who helped move the party to be influenced by radicals like Saul Alinsky. They are a dangerous political party in dire need of reform or dissolution. 






Saturday, May 18, 2024

I Stand With Harrison Butker!

 “Blessed are you when men hate you, and when they exclude you and revile you, and cast out your name as evil, on account of the Son of man! Rejoice in that day, and leap for joy, for behold, your reward is great in Heaven; for so their fathers did to the prophets.”

- Luke 6:22-23

“If the world hate you, know ye, that it hath hated Me before you. If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember My word that I said to you: The servant is not greater than his master. If they have persecuted Me, they will also persecute you: if they have kept My word, they will keep yours also. But all these things they will do to you for My name's sake: because they know not him who sent Me. If I had not come, and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin.”

- John 15:18-22


Liberals Spread Fake Quote to Try to Discredit Kansas City Chiefs Star Harrison Butker

 From Fr Peter West: 

“There is a meme a false quote from Harrison Butker being shared on Facebook about wanting to go back to the 50's. It's a blatant mischaracterization of what he said in his commencement address at Benedictine College. It's from his enemies who want to discredit him. Many of my friends have shared it thinking that it's real. If you shared it please delete it because it's making those of of us who support traditional values look like fools.

“You can listen to what he actually said below. It's far more reasonable than the false quote that's going around which is why his enemies feel they have to deceive people to try to discredit him.”

Video: Harrison Butker | Commencement Address 2024 | Benedictine College

It is a sad commentary on modern society when a Catholic husband and father is being attacked for voicing a message that is entirely compatible with Faith and Reason and with the sacred deposit of the Catholic Faith. Liberals attack him for encouraging motherhood and godly families and the Natural Moral Law while they cannot tell the difference between male and female and think that it is okay for a trans who looks like a grotesque and perverted clown to tell “stories” to children! 

Thursday, May 2, 2024

St. Mary’s on Broadway - YouTube

 There is a wonderful YouTube channel by an FSSP parish in Rhode Island that consistently livestreams the weekday and Sunday Masses and also talks, weddings, and other events. The channel livestreams the Traditional Latin Mass twice daily and three times on Sunday (their 10:30am Mass on Sunday is a beautiful Sung Mass). They also pray the Divine Office before or after most of their weekday Masses. 

Their choir is beautiful, powerful and well-trained. I understand it is the talented Garrepy family that heads the choir. 

The channel is a great way to get away from the noise of the world and from earthly distractions to focus and re-focus on otherworldly beauty and truth that is truly heavenly and edifying.

Please subscribe to this channel @ https://youtube.com/@StMarysonBroadwayFSSP?si=7BPoZY9p5ptiIQa2



Thursday, June 22, 2023

Apparition of Our Lady of Quito - The Marian apparition of 1610

William Oddie describes the message and warning in an article that was published in the Catholic Herald in July 2012. 

"Early in the morning of January 21, 1610, the Archangels St. Michael, St. Gabriel and St. Raphael appeared to Mother Mariana. Then Our Lady appeared to her and predicted many things about our own times: this is part of what Mother Mariana afterwards related that she told her:

“…. I make it known to you that from the end of the 19th century and shortly after the middle of the 20th century…. the passions will erupt and there will be a total corruption of customs (morals)….

“They will focus principally on the children in order to sustain this general corruption. Woe to the children of these times!

“Further, in these unhappy times, there will be unbridled luxury, which will ensnare the rest into sin and conquer innumerable frivolous souls, who will be lost. Innocence will almost no longer be found in children, nor modesty in women. In this supreme moment of need of the Church, the one who should speak will fall silent.”  

https://catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2012/07/26/our-lady-of-quito-prophesied-that-in-the-60s-there-would-be-spiritual-catastrophe-in-the-church-then-through-the-faith-of-the-just-a-complete-restoration/

Thursday, June 1, 2023

The Month of June is Dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus


I


The month of June has been dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus since 1856. It is not a month to celebrate the sin of pride and the sin of sodomy. We all ought to turn away from sin and practice virtue over vice and engage in daily mental prayer in accord with the Saints to achieve our ultimate goal at the end of life which is Heaven. 

Why is June dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus?

Act of Reparation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus
 
† O sweet Jesus, Whose overflowing charity for men is requited by so much forgetfulness, negligence and contempt, behold us prostrate before Thy altar eager to repair by a special act of homage the cruel indifference and injuries, to which Thy loving Heart is everywhere subject.

Mindful alas! that we ourselves have had a share in such great indignities, which we now deplore from the depths of our hearts, we humbly ask Thy pardon and declare our readiness to atone by voluntary expiation not only for our own personal offenses, but also for the sins of those, who, straying far from the path of salvation, refuse in their obstinate infidelity to follow Thee, their Shepherd and Leader, or, renouncing the vows of their baptism, have cast off the sweet yoke of Thy Law.

We are now resolved to expiate each and every deplorable outrage committed against Thee; we are determined to make amends for the manifold offenses against Christian modesty in unbecoming dress and behavior, for all the foul seductions laid to ensnare the feet of the innocent, for the frequent violations of Sundays and holidays, and the shocking blasphemies uttered against Thee and Thy Saints.

We wish also to make amends for the insults to which Thy Vicar on earth and Thy priests are subjected, for the profanation, by conscious neglect or terrible acts of sacrilege, of the very Sacrament of Thy Divine Love; and lastly for the public crimes of nations who resist the rights and teaching authority of the Church which Thou hast founded.

Would, O divine Jesus, we were able to wash away such abominations with our blood. We now offer, in reparation for these violations of Thy divine honor, the satisfaction Thou didst once make to Thy eternal Father on the cross and which Thou dost continue to renews daily on our altars; we offer it in union with the acts of atonement of Thy Virgin Mother and all the Saints and of the pious faithful on earth; and we sincerely promise to make recompense, as far as we can with the help of Thy grace, for all neglect of Thy great love and for the sins we and others have committed in the past. Henceforth we will live a life of unwavering faith, of purity of conduct, of perfect observance of the precepts of the gospel and especially that of charity. We promise to the best of our power to prevent other from offending Thee and to bring as many as possible to follow Thee.

O loving Jesus, through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, our model in reparation, deign to receive the voluntary offering we make of this act of expiation; and by the crowning gift of perseverance keep us faithful unto death in our duty and the allegiance we owe to Thee, so that we may one day come to that happy home, where Thou with the Father and the Holy Ghost livest and reignest God, world without end. Amen. †



Thursday, April 20, 2023

EXCLUSIVE: Some Key Questions Surrounding the FOX News Settlement with Dominion Voting Machines



Update: There are other ways Democrats steal recent elections and it has nothing to do with Dominion. . . 

WAYNE ROOT: Fox News-Dominion Legal Settlement is Biggest Bait & Switch Scam in History



Update: A valid point the liberals on CNN and MSNBC who are celebrating the cowardly settlement by Fox News are overlooking is that Fox’s 2020 election coverage led by liberal Chris Wallace who as a “moderator” constantly interrupted President Trump while treating Joe Biden like Wallace and Biden were best friends during the first Presidential debate was deeply criticized by conservatives for its horrible election coverage so much that conservatives at that time decided to move on to conservative media outlets that favored President Trump and MAGA coverage. 

Fox’s Neil Cavuto ended a broadcast of a press conference by then White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany when she addressed Trump’s voter fraud allegations after Election Day. (‘CNN and MSNBC dominate ratings after Election Day coverage, leaving Fox News in third place,’ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cnn-and-msnbc-dominate-ratings-after-election-day-coverage-leaving-fox-news-in-third-place)

Consider this article from November 10, 2020: 

Fox News beginning to see massive conservative backlash following election coverage



It does not make sense for Fox to settle a case when it rarely raised questions concerning Election Day fraud and often silenced coverage of President Trump and his supporters who voiced election fraud allegations and other allegations including the Hunter Biden scandal which Chris Wallace and Fox News in general rejected as a legitimate concern.

Bill O’Reilly, formerly of Fox News, may be right when he says the reason Fox refused to fight is because Rupert Murdoch at 92 did not want to go through a trial and he likely told his lawyers to just make a deal and move on knowing that Fox’s most loyal viewership will stay and continue keeping the ratings up in spite of backlash received from Trump supporters and other conservatives.



———————



Excerpts: 

5. Why did FOX not rely on the facts from its discovery?  Eric Coomer, the former executive of Dominion, and many others had issues with the system, saying “our sh*t is just riddled with bugs”.  Is that not totally damning in this case?

6. Why did FOX News not rely on the information available on Dominion discovered and reported by The Gateway Pundit and other publications before and after the 2020 Election?

6a. We know from the New Mexico auditafter the 2020 Election that the Dominion Auditing Machines can fill in ballots.

6b. We know from Tennessee and New Mexico that an erroneous code was found on Dominion voting machines.  This came after the machines were reportedly certified.

6c. We know that Professor J. Alex Halderman, from the University of Michigan, audited Dominion Voting Machines in Georgia after the 2020 Election, and corrupt Obama Judge Totenberg will not to this day release this report.  (Why did FOX News not demand to see this report?)

7. Why would FOX not demand an audit of the Dominion system by subject matter experts before agreeing to anything?  This wouldn’t cost even a million dollars.  Time after time Dominion and the government worked together to prevent audits of Dominion software after the election.  In the corporate world, you wouldn’t think of certifying an audit without thoroughly analyzing the software impacting the scope of the audit.  Why is this happening with any elections in the US?

——

Another legitimate question that ought to be raised is why didn’t Fox defend itself by addressing the multiple sworn affidavits voicing eye-witness accounts of voter fraud and why didn’t they seek the testimony of the former chair of the Federal Election Commission who in 2020 publicly stated, "I Do Believe There Is Fraud in These Places" ... "Makes This an Illegitimate Election.” (https://youtu.be/ilDwQrOYngE)

Fox should have compiled video testimony proving the possibility of voter fraud including the Dominion-Trained IT contractor who lit up a key Michigan Hearing by testifying, “They Were Re-Scanning, Counting Ballots 8 to 10 Times’. Then there is the Maricopa County evidence of an official caught on video admitting to election fraud. 

Of course, the phony “fact-checkers” covered-up and twisted around these facts for the convenience of the Democrat Party. 

Another question that could have been raised by Fox in its defense is that if Dominion is so neutral and fair then why is it so closely tied to the Democrat Party? 

According to a report, 

“Bloomberg reported in April of last year that Dominion Voting Systems hired a high-powered lobbying firm that includes a longtime aide to Pelosi. They hired Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account.

“In 2014, Dominion was listed in the Washington Post table as having donated between $25,001-$50,000 to the Clinton Foundation.” (https://www.worldtribune.com/dominion-voting-systems-tied-to-clintons-widely-used-in-battleground-states/

And why didn’t Fox seek the services of law firms that would have defended their claims pro bono? This includes the Thomas More Society law firm.

From the Thomas More Society law firm: 

“After allegations that Dominion Voting Systems had flipped votes in swing states — the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) — made a counter statement Nov. 12 disputing those allegations. 

“CISA claimed ‘the November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.’

“All well and good, right? Wrong! Did you know Dominion Voting Systems is a member of CISA’s Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council? And Dominion is one of two entities that authored that statement put out by CISA.

“A company cannot testify on its own behalf. This calls into question the validity of that very testimony. Using this fake testimony as proof there is nothing to see here only shines the light of suspicion that much brighter.”

Fox should have brought up examples of how even liberal news outlets like the Providence Journal have questioned the legitimacy of elections in liberal states including Rhode Island where election fraud has been ongoing with zero transparency from leading election officials under the past three liberal governors. 

There are more questions than answers that follow the ridiculous and inexcusable settlement made by Fox with Dominion. The far-Left may be gloating and filling the comment boxes of conservative news organizations like Newsmax all day and all night long (do these liberals work because they spend a lot of their time trolling conservatives 24/7?), but there are too many cases of voter fraud or irresponsible handling of voting machines and ballots that simply cannot be dismissed and overlooked by relying on what the majority of the mainstream liberal media and the phony and biased “fact-checkers” on Facebook and elsewhere say about elections. These are the same biased outlets that never say a word whenever Democrats like Hillary Clinton question the legitimacy of an election including the 2016 Presidential election. 

Will it take several decades for the truth to come out as it did with the LBJ case?

"A study of Lyndon B. Johnson [Democrat] provides new evidence that the 36th President stole his first election to the United States Senate, in 1948. The book, 'Means of Ascent,' by Robert A. Caro, is the second volume of a projected four-volume study, 'The Years of Lyndon Johnson.'

SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/11/ us/how-johnson-won-election-he-d-lost.html




[More will be added to this post at a later date]